Gina Pizzo, Managing Director
Alex Joya, Managing Director
Laurie Wik, Senior Director
Louis Mancini, Senior Director
January 16, 2019 / North America
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act which reduced the U.S. corporate federal income tax rate to 21 percent and created an incentive for companies to repatriate foreign earnings, also helped boost interest in domestic investment. The U.S. became a more attractive option for inbound M&A activity as 2018 saw more deals, including several “mega deals” across many industries. While some observers have voiced concerns about an impending economic correction or downturn, many economists predict that both corporate and private equity investors will continue to enjoy record access to capital as they continue to invest heavily in the technology, healthcare, and energy sectors.
As deal teams rush to provide proper valuations and conduct financial and tax due diligence, sales and use tax due diligence is more important than ever and can even be the most significant tax exposure uncovered in the due diligence process. Thus, neglecting sales and use taxes in due diligence can result in an unpleasant surprise for the acquirer after the deal closes and can become a major pain point for the Chief Financial Officer, whose team will then need to identify, quantify, and remediate the exposures.
How can you evaluate potential sales and use tax exposure prior to an acquisition?
Detecting potential exposure in the sales tax due diligence process is a matter of determining whether the target was filing sales and use tax returns in jurisdictions where it had nexus, and whether Target under-reported its sales and/or use tax liability in the jurisdictions it filed returns. The following key areas should be addressed: